Last update: August 19, 2010
*For information mentioned in previous Litigation Reports, please visit the Archives page.
Summary of Cases
Civil Matters
Please note that the following proceedings have not all been adjudicated upon by a court of law. Until the allegations in each of the following proceedings have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, all the accused are to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law.
Competition Tribunal
Assigned Counsel: R. Nassrallah (CBLS) and J. Rook et al. (Legal Agent)
Opposing Counsel: K. Kay
Nature of Matter: Application by Commissioner under section 79 of the Competition Act (Abuse of Dominance) -- The Commissioner argues that CREA and its members have used their control of the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) system and related trademarks to impose exclusionary restrictions in the supply of residential real estate brokerage services and thus limiting the alternative business models in the market.
Status: The Commissioner filed her Notice of Application on February 8, 2010. CREA filed their response on March 26, 2010. The Commissioner filed her reply on April 9, 2010. On July 8, 2010, motions for leave to intervene was denied for Lawrence Dale and was allowed for National FSBO Network. The hearing of the section 79 application is scheduled for April and May 2011.
Hyperlink:
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03196.html
http://www.ct-tc.gc.ca/CasesAffaires/CasesDetails-eng.asp?CaseID=325
Competition Tribunal (Vancouver)
Assigned Counsel: J. Syme
Opposing Counsel: S.L. Swan (Harper Gray – Vancouver)
Nature of Matter: The Commissioner filed an application under s.74.1 of the Competition Act against the Respondents. The Commissioner alleges that the Respondents made false and misleading representations to prospective clients. The Respondents promised to give the prospective clients exclusive contacts with potential employers if they entered into contract with them. The Respondents also promised to help them find work quickly, with better salary and benefits.
Status: On May 8, 2007, the Commissioner filed a Notice of Application. The hearing was on April 14 to 25, 2008, in Vancouver; Decision was released on July 15, 2008. The tribunal dismissed the Application. Notice of Appeal was filed by the Commissioner on September 30, 2008. On October 16, 2009, the Federal Court granted the Competition Bureau’s appeal.
Decision on other remedies and costs reserved.
Hyperlink:
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/02326.html
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03144.html
Competition Tribunal
Assigned Counsel: N. Iatrou
Opposing Counsel: N/A
Nature of Matter: The Commissioner filed an application under s.74.1 of the Competition Act against the Respondents. The Commissioner alleges that the Respondents made false misleading representations to prospective clients, associating the hot tubs and spas with the ENERGY STAR name, symbol and program.
Status: The Commissioner filed a Notice of Application on July 20, 2010.
Please note that the following proceedings have not all been adjudicated upon by a court of law. Until the allegations in each of the following proceedings have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, all the accused are to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law.
Cour du Québec (Montreal)
Assigned Counsel: S. Hould
Opposing Counsel: E. Vanchestein (Shadley Battista)
Nature of Matter: false representations under s. 52 of the Competition Act
Status: Judicial Pre-Trial scheduled for June 23, 2010. Trial set for November 15 to 24, 2010.
Ontario Court of Justice (Toronto)
Assigned Counsel: G. Reitz (ORO), G. Caracciolo
Opposing Counsel: Unrepresented
Nature of Matter: charges under s. 52 of the Competition Act and s. 380 of the Criminal Code relating to alleged false or misleading representations and fraud over $5000 with respect to an alleged therapy for cancer which involves exposing cancer patients to low level electromagnetic wave therapy.
Status: charges laid: August 2005;
On December 5, 2008, Mr. Reynolds was committed for trial on all charges. Four week trial scheduled to commence on April 6, 2010. Bench warrant issued. Trial date vacated.
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench
Assigned Counsel: P. Papadatou; Alta. Jus. Special Prosecutions; J. Ma
Opposing Counsel: : D. Mohr (Savage Silver Kiss & Virk); D. Chow; R. Snukal (Roulston Snukal); A. Fay (Fay & Archer); J. Lutz (Dartnell & Lutz)
Nature of Matter: charges under s.52.1 of the Competition Act and s.380 of the Criminal Code relating to the telemarketing of a business directory and listing in such directory.
Status: Charges laid June 14, 2006.
On January 30, 2007, Sarah Schaefer pleaded guilty to two counts of s.52.1 of the Competition Act and received a fine of $15,000;
Preliminary hearing was in June 2008; Janene Cheung was discharged at the end of the preliminary hearing;
First appearance before the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench scheduled for August 22, 2008. Trial evidence completed in December 2009. Adjourned to September 20-24, 2010 for closing arguments.
Cour supérieure du Québec, Montreal
Assigned counsel: J. Marshall
Opposing counsel: J. Bertrand, C. Monterosso, I. Schurman, J. Peris, N. Tucci, J. Brossard
Nature of Matter: Application for certiorari filed by companies and individuals affected by the search. The application is to obtain an order to quash the decision of justice of the peace to authorize the search.
Status: Certiorari hearing was from April 21 to 25, 2008. On June 6, 2008, the Court decided to uphold the warrants and indicated that there was no charter violation in the garbage seizure.
Questions now under appeal to the Quebec Court of Appeal.
Cour du Québec, Montreal
Assigned counsel: S. Hould
Opposing counsel: L. Huot (represents Mr. Kornelson), Z. Al-Baghdadi (represents Mr. Steczko)
Nature of matter: Charges under s.52.1 of the Competition Act relating to the telemarketing of a business directory by the following companies: Commutel, Marketing USA et Global Management Systems.
Status: Charges laid on February 27 2008. Byron Steczko, Anh-Phong Vo and Cory Kornelson pleaded guilty and obtained a six-month conditional sentence with curfew conditions, as well as a 10-year prohibition order from engaging in telemarketing. An arrest warrant was issued against Hiep Manh Nguyen.
Hyperlink:
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/02649.html
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03163.html
Cour du Québec, Chicoutimi
Assigned counsel: S. Hould, V. Chénard
Opposing counsel: J.-M. Fradette
Nature of matter: Bid-rigging charges under s. 47 of the Competition Act. Charges laid against three construction companies and their presidents based on allegations that the parties entered into agreements to predetermine which would win some contracts.
Status: Charges laid on November 10, 2008. First appearance was on January 5, 2009.
Hyperlink:
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/02748.html
Ontario Court of Justice, Ottawa
Assigned counsel: V. Chénard, D. Pilon
Opposing counsel: P. Mantas, P. McCann, W. Vanveen & A. Patenaude, M. Neville, G. Chayko, E. Dufour & K. Glover, W. Carroll, N. Boxall, D. Daoust & J. Shields, R. Wagner, J. Langevin, S. May, M. McGarvey
Nature of matter: Bid-rigging charges under s. 47 of the Competition Act. Charges laid against 7 companies and 14 individuals based on allegations that the parties entered into agreements to coordinate their bids in an illegal scheme to defraud the government by winning and dividing contracts for information technology services.
Status: Charges laid on February 17, 2009. Ms. Lambert pleaded guilty to one count of bid-rigging on February 23, 2009 at the Superior Court of Ontario. First appearance was on March 17, 2009. On June 9, 2009, Theodore Martin (former owner of TRM Technologies Inc.) pleaded guilty. He was fined $25,000 and a prohibition order was issued against TRM Technologies Inc. The preliminary inquiry is scheduled for December 1st 2010. Focus hearing was on June 23, 2010 and will continue on September 8, 2010.
Hyperlink:
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/02983.html
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03075.html
Cour supérieure du Québec
Assigned counsel: D. Pilon, S. Hould
Nature of matter: Charges under s. 45 of the Competition Act relating to the price fixing of gasoline at the pump in Victoriaville, Thetford Mines, Magog and Sherbrooke. Charges laid against eleven companies and thirteen individuals in June 2008. New charges laid against three companies and twenty-five individuals in July 2010.
Status: Five of the companies and ten of the individuals have pleaded guilty with fines totalling over $2.7 million. Six of the individuals have been sentenced to a total of 54 months in prison. On March 25-26, 2010, charges were withdrawn against Alimentations Couche-Tard inc, and charges were laid against Couche-Tard inc. Appearance and pro forma hearings scheduled for September 13, 2010 in Sherbrooke, September 17, 2010 in Victoriaville and October 1st in Thetford Mines.
Hyperlink:
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03055.html
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03145.html
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03079.html
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03262.html
Assigned counsel: G. Pinsonnault
Opposing counsel: R. Schadley, É. Vanchestein
Nature of matter: Charges under s. 52.1(3) and 52(1) of the Competition Act for engaging in deceptive telemarketing activities involving the sale of business directories.
Status: On June 16, 2009, four companies pleaded guilty before the Court of Québec and were fined $725,000. In addition, prohibition orders were issued by the Superior Court of Quebec against Bianca Rosa Pazzano and Darren Johnston, who operated these companies.
Hyperlink:
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03083.html
Cour du Québec
Assigned counsel: J. Marshall, V. Chénard, R. Morin
Opposing counsel: J. Gordon
Nature of matter: Charges laid under ss. 52 and 52.1 of the Competition Act for engaging in deceptive telemarketing activities related to business directory scams. Charges laid against three individuals and six companies on April 12, 2010.
Status: Next Pro forma is scheduled for September 21, 2010.
Hyperlink:
http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03222.html
*For information mentioned in previous Litigation Reports, please visit the Archives page.